From 83b03a38e0ab88224d3f8ce9ddfbbdd82038455c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samo Penic <samo.penic@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:55:40 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Seems to work. Lookout for debug code in main.c and initial_distribution.c
---
src/initial_distribution.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/initial_distribution.c b/src/initial_distribution.c
index 0f59aec..2444e15 100644
--- a/src/initial_distribution.c
+++ b/src/initial_distribution.c
@@ -14,8 +14,14 @@
ts_fprintf(stderr,"Starting initial_distribution on vesicle with %u shells!...\n",nshell);
ts_bool retval;
ts_uint no_vertices=5*nshell*nshell+2;
+
+
ts_vesicle *vesicle=init_vesicle(no_vertices,ncmax1,ncmax2,ncmax3,stepsize);
+
+//TODO: debugging only. Please remove ASAP!
+ vesicle->bending_rigidity=25.0*25.0;
+
vesicle->nshell=nshell;
retval = vtx_set_global_values(vesicle);
retval = pentagonal_dipyramid_vertex_distribution(vesicle->vlist);
@@ -64,40 +70,40 @@
ts_double dx,dy; // end loop prereq
/* topmost vertex */
- vtx[1]->data->x=0.0;
- vtx[1]->data->y=0.0;
- vtx[1]->data->z=z0*(ts_double)nshell;
+ vtx[1]->x=0.0;
+ vtx[1]->y=0.0;
+ vtx[1]->z=z0*(ts_double)nshell;
/* starting from to in circular order on pentagrams */
for(i=1;i<=nshell;i++){
n0=2+5*i*(i-1)/2; //-1 would be for the reason that C index starts from 0
- vtx[n0]->data->x=0.0;
- vtx[n0]->data->y=(ts_double)i*xl0;
- vtx[n0+i]->data->x=vtx[n0]->data->y*s1;
- vtx[n0+i]->data->y=vtx[n0]->data->y*c1;
- vtx[n0+2*i]->data->x=vtx[n0]->data->y*s2;
- vtx[n0+2*i]->data->y=vtx[n0]->data->y*c2;
- vtx[n0+3*i]->data->x=-vtx[n0+2*i]->data->x;
- vtx[n0+3*i]->data->y=vtx[n0+2*i]->data->y;
- vtx[n0+4*i]->data->x=-vtx[n0+i]->data->x;
- vtx[n0+4*i]->data->y=vtx[n0+i]->data->y;
+ vtx[n0]->x=0.0;
+ vtx[n0]->y=(ts_double)i*xl0;
+ vtx[n0+i]->x=vtx[n0]->y*s1;
+ vtx[n0+i]->y=vtx[n0]->y*c1;
+ vtx[n0+2*i]->x=vtx[n0]->y*s2;
+ vtx[n0+2*i]->y=vtx[n0]->y*c2;
+ vtx[n0+3*i]->x=-vtx[n0+2*i]->x;
+ vtx[n0+3*i]->y=vtx[n0+2*i]->y;
+ vtx[n0+4*i]->x=-vtx[n0+i]->x;
+ vtx[n0+4*i]->y=vtx[n0+i]->y;
}
/* vertexes on the faces of the dipyramid */
for(i=1;i<=nshell;i++){
n0=2+5*i*(i-1)/2; // -1 would be because of C!
for(j=1;j<=i-1;j++){
- dx=(vtx[n0]->data->x-vtx[n0+4*i]->data->x)/(ts_double)i;
- dy=(vtx[n0]->data->y-vtx[n0+4*i]->data->y)/(ts_double)i;
- vtx[n0+4*i+j]->data->x=(ts_double)j*dx+vtx[n0+4*i]->data->x;
- vtx[n0+4*i+j]->data->y=(ts_double)j*dy+vtx[n0+4*i]->data->y;
+ dx=(vtx[n0]->x-vtx[n0+4*i]->x)/(ts_double)i;
+ dy=(vtx[n0]->y-vtx[n0+4*i]->y)/(ts_double)i;
+ vtx[n0+4*i+j]->x=(ts_double)j*dx+vtx[n0+4*i]->x;
+ vtx[n0+4*i+j]->y=(ts_double)j*dy+vtx[n0+4*i]->y;
}
for(k=0;k<=3;k++){ // I would be worried about zero starting of for
- dx=(vtx[n0+(k+1)*i]->data->x - vtx[n0+k*i]->data->x)/(ts_double) i;
- dy=(vtx[n0+(k+1)*i]->data->y - vtx[n0+k*i]->data->y)/(ts_double) i;
+ dx=(vtx[n0+(k+1)*i]->x - vtx[n0+k*i]->x)/(ts_double) i;
+ dy=(vtx[n0+(k+1)*i]->y - vtx[n0+k*i]->y)/(ts_double) i;
for(j=1; j<=i-1;j++){
- vtx[n0+k*i+j]->data->x= (ts_double)j*dx+vtx[n0+k*i]->data->x;
- vtx[n0+k*i+j]->data->y= (ts_double)j*dy+vtx[n0+k*i]->data->y;
+ vtx[n0+k*i+j]->x= (ts_double)j*dx+vtx[n0+k*i]->x;
+ vtx[n0+k*i+j]->y= (ts_double)j*dy+vtx[n0+k*i]->y;
}
}
}
@@ -105,15 +111,15 @@
for(i=1;i<=nshell;i++){
n0= 2+ 5*i*(i-1)/2;
for(j=0;j<=5*i-1;j++){
- vtx[n0+j]->data->z= z0*(ts_double)(nshell-i); // I would be worried about zero starting of for
+ vtx[n0+j]->z= z0*(ts_double)(nshell-i); // I would be worried about zero starting of for
}
}
/* for botom part of dipyramide we calculate the positions of vertices */
for(i=2+5*nshell*(nshell+1)/2;i<=vlist->n;i++){
- vtx[i]->data->x=vtx[vlist->n - i +1]->data->x;
- vtx[i]->data->y=vtx[vlist->n - i +1]->data->y;
- vtx[i]->data->z=-vtx[vlist->n - i +1]->data->z;
+ vtx[i]->x=vtx[vlist->n - i +1]->x;
+ vtx[i]->y=vtx[vlist->n - i +1]->y;
+ vtx[i]->z=-vtx[vlist->n - i +1]->z;
}
for(i=1;i<=vlist->n;i++){
@@ -166,15 +172,16 @@
ts_double direct; // Something, dont know what, but could be normal of some kind
for(i=1;i<=vlist->n;i++){
k++; // WHY i IS NOT GOOD??
- vtx_add_cneighbour(blist,tvtx[k], tvtx[vtx[i]->data->neigh[0]->idx+1]); //always add 1st
+ vtx_add_cneighbour(blist,tvtx[k], tvtx[vtx[i]->neigh[0]->idx+1]); //always add 1st
jjj=1;
jj=1;
- for(l=2;l<=vtx[i]->data->neigh_no;l++){
- for(j=2;j<=vtx[i]->data->neigh_no;j++){
- dist2=vtx_distance_sq(vtx[i]->data->neigh[j-1],vtx[i]->data->neigh[jj-1]);
- direct=vtx_direct(vtx[i],vtx[i]->data->neigh[j-1],vtx[i]->data->neigh[jj-1]);
+ for(l=2;l<=vtx[i]->neigh_no;l++){
+ for(j=2;j<=vtx[i]->neigh_no;j++){
+ dist2=vtx_distance_sq(vtx[i]->neigh[j-1],vtx[i]->neigh[jj-1]);
+ direct=vtx_direct(vtx[i],vtx[i]->neigh[j-1],vtx[i]->neigh[jj-1]);
+// TODO: check if fabs can be used with all floating point types!!
if( (fabs(dist2-A0*A0)<=eps) && (direct>0.0) && (j!=jjj) ){
- vtx_add_cneighbour(blist,tvtx[k],tvtx[vtx[i]->data->neigh[j-1]->idx+1]);
+ vtx_add_cneighbour(blist,tvtx[k],tvtx[vtx[i]->neigh[j-1]->idx+1]);
jjj=jj;
jj=j;
break;
@@ -206,8 +213,8 @@
ts_uint i,j,k;
for(i=1;i<=vlist->n;i++){
for(j=i+1;j<=vlist->n;j++){
- for(k=0;k<vtx[i]->data->neigh_no;k++){ // has changed 0 to < instead of 1 and <=
- if(vtx[i]->data->neigh[k]==vtx[j]){ //if addresses matches it is the same
+ for(k=0;k<vtx[i]->neigh_no;k++){ // has changed 0 to < instead of 1 and <=
+ if(vtx[i]->neigh[k]==vtx[j]){ //if addresses matches it is the same
bond_add(blist,vtx[i],vtx[j]);
break;
}
@@ -232,14 +239,15 @@
ts_double eps=0.001; // can we use EPS from math.h?
k=0;
for(i=1;i<=vesicle->vlist->n;i++){
- for(j=1;j<=vtx[i]->data->neigh_no;j++){
- for(jj=1;jj<=vtx[i]->data->neigh_no;jj++){
+ for(j=1;j<=vtx[i]->neigh_no;j++){
+ for(jj=1;jj<=vtx[i]->neigh_no;jj++){
// ts_fprintf(stderr,"%u: (%u,%u) neigh_no=%u ",i,j,jj,vtx[i].neigh_no);
// ts_fprintf(stderr,"%e, %e",vtx[i].neigh[j-1]->x,vtx[i].neigh[jj-1]->x);
- dist=vtx_distance_sq(vtx[i]->data->neigh[j-1],vtx[i]->data->neigh[jj-1]);
- direct=vtx_direct(vtx[i],vtx[i]->data->neigh[j-1],vtx[i]->data->neigh[jj-1]);
- if(fabs(dist-A0*A0)<=eps && direct < 0.0 && vtx[i]->data->neigh[j-1]->idx+1 > i && vtx[i]->data->neigh[jj-1]->idx+1 >i){
- triangle_add(tlist,vtx[i],vtx[i]->data->neigh[j-1],vtx[i]->data->neigh[jj-1]);
+ dist=vtx_distance_sq(vtx[i]->neigh[j-1],vtx[i]->neigh[jj-1]);
+ direct=vtx_direct(vtx[i],vtx[i]->neigh[j-1],vtx[i]->neigh[jj-1]);
+// TODO: same as above
+ if(fabs(dist-A0*A0)<=eps && direct < 0.0 && vtx[i]->neigh[j-1]->idx+1 > i && vtx[i]->neigh[jj-1]->idx+1 >i){
+ triangle_add(tlist,vtx[i],vtx[i]->neigh[j-1],vtx[i]->neigh[jj-1]);
}
}
}
@@ -254,7 +262,7 @@
k++;
}
if(k!=3){
- fatal("Some triangles has less than 3 vertices..",4);
+ fatal("Some triangles have less than 3 vertices..",4);
}
}
if(tlist->n!=2*(vesicle->vlist->n -2)){
@@ -334,11 +342,11 @@
ts_triangle **tria=tlist->tria -1;
for(i=1;i<=vesicle->vlist->n;i++){
- for(j=1;j<=vtx[i]->data->neigh_no;j++){
- k1=vtx[i]->data->neigh[j-1];
+ for(j=1;j<=vtx[i]->neigh_no;j++){
+ k1=vtx[i]->neigh[j-1];
jp=j+1;
- if(j == vtx[i]->data->neigh_no) jp=1;
- k2=vtx[i]->data->neigh[jp-1];
+ if(j == vtx[i]->neigh_no) jp=1;
+ k2=vtx[i]->neigh[jp-1];
for(k=1;k<=tlist->n;k++){ // VERY NON-OPTIMAL!!! too many loops (vlist.n * vtx.neigh * tlist.n )!
k3=tria[k]->vertex[0];
k4=tria[k]->vertex[1];
--
Gitblit v1.9.3